Key Takeaways
- The bride was upset her fiancé spent $80 on an engagement ring, despite suggesting rings under $100 herself.
- The couple’s financial struggles, including government assistance, highlight the importance of prioritizing needs over luxury purchases.
- Reddit users urged the groom to address his fiancée’s mixed messages and consider whether their values align long-term.
Often adorned with exquisite diamonds or other sparkling gemstones, engagement rings are known to be valuable pieces of jewelry. And because they represent a couple’s lifelong commitment, their sentimental value is just as significant as their monetary value. When one woman found out that her future husband proposed with an engagement ring that cost him $80, she was devastated and angry. According to her fiancé’s Reddit post on the “Am I the A------“ subreddit on January 5, 2025, however, there seems to be a catch: Because they’re low-income and because she recommended sparklers priced at less than $100, in his eyes, he was working within his means and following instructions. From her perspective, his partner thinks she deserves a jewel that’s worth his entire paycheck, $700.
Key Takeaways
- Since a couple is living below the poverty line with two children and a roommate, both partners agreed that the symbolism behind an engagement ring is more important than the cost.
- The woman in the relationship found a few potential rings that were reasonably priced (less than $100) according to their financial situation, so her boyfriend bought one that was $80.
- When he proposed with the ring, she was furious, claiming that he should have spent an entire paycheck on the bauble ($700).
- Reddit decided that the woman had unrealistic expectations and encouraged the man to have a conversation with her.
While describing the situation to the internet, the Redditor noted that neither he nor his fiancée have a lot of money—in fact, he receives financial support from the government. “We live with a roommate and have 2 children to provide for,” he wrote. “My income covers us and we fit into the tax bracket for food stamps and Medicaid.” Based on their financial situation, the couple agreed that the “thought and meaningfulness” behind an engagement ring is much more important to them than the price if they were to ever get engaged, per the post.
When their relationship got serious and they started talking about an engagement, the woman started browsing affordable engagement rings online that she liked. “She had directly pointed out a couple ‘On Sale’ rings from some websites and they were all really pretty and in the under $100 range,” the Redditor recounted. Based on his girlfriend’s suggestions, the man ended up buying one that had an $80 price tag. “$80 not gonna turn fingers green but also no flashy diamond,” he said of his purchase.
Because the man got into a car accident that limited his mobility, he opted for a low-key proposal on New Year’s. “I asked and she seemed surprised but not in an excited way,” he revealed. A couple of days later, she voiced her concerns to her future husband. “She confronted me about how the ring was only $80 not even $100 and how it made her feel that she wasn't worth spending a full paycheck ($700) on,” he recalled of her thoughts on the ring. “I’m very confused if I'm in the wrong here or what exactly happened.”
beyond foto / Getty Images
The internet concluded that the Redditor was blameless in the situation, and his post sparked a heated discussion on the “rule” that an individual’s salary should determine the appropriate amount of money to spend on an engagement ring. “People who rely on the government to support them through Medicaid and food stamps should NOT spend an entire paycheck on an engagement ring,” the top comment said. “In this situation, you have your priorities straight.” Others added to the comment, noting that regardless of a person’s income, “nobody should spend a full paycheck on an engagement ring,” according to one Redditor. Some emphasized the idea that the value of an engagement ring shouldn’t be the utmost priority. “The ring is just an external reminder of your commitment to each other,” another Reddit user commented.
Many decided that the man’s fiancée has unrealistic expectations and is sending her partner mixed messages. “She can’t agree and pretend to be excited over rings on the internet that were similar in price to the one you got her and then get upset about it,” one person stated. “She’s the one who sent you the links to the cheap rings. I would 100% call her out on that. If she wanted a pricier ring she should have brought that up instead of telling you the exact opposite.”
Regardless of who’s at fault, Reddit encouraged the man to have a conversation with his future spouse. “Yea, you need to bring that up with her directly,” someone wrote. “Hey, honey, we talked about this and we're both fully aware of the financial situation—and you said that the cost of the ring didn't matter.” Some even suggested he rethink his relationship. “Every woman who complains about the cost of the ring is not worth it to begin with imo,” someone concluded, while another said, “The fact she is flipping out it wasn’t expensive enough with all those other considerations is a HUGE red flag imo.”
